Re: Class Time Slice -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Class Time Slice
From: Pete Hall <pbhall@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 17:03:02 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

At 12:16 03/25/2003, Doug Hart wrote:

 IBM still has the default for the interactive class time slice at 2000.
This has been in place since the beginnings of OS/400.  With today's
superior processors what is the suggested value?  Does a table exist
anywhere that shows settings for different generations of systems?  I'm
running my 830 with the QINTER class time slice set at 100 or 200.

Comments.

10% of the shipped values has worked fine for me.


Pete Hall
pbhall@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pbhall.us/

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.