|
> From: rob@dekko.com > > While you raised some good points, I think that many people on this list > have at least tried something new on the company nickle without writing up > a formal education plan. For example, if someone shows you a new RPG op > code do you have to request additional formal training just to try it out? > Most people would hate working for a company like that. Depends on how many nickels. Zak says it only took him half an hour, and it was on his own time. That's perfectly acceptable. If it was a week on company time, I'd fire the person doing the "research". MAYBE reprimand them if it was an honest first time mistake. Anything else is resume padding. > Now there was the time that someone spent a few days trying to load > something that we put the brakes on. Been several years. Might have even > been the OS/2 version of SSA's tool. The Assistants were an extra cost product. I doubt you spent the extra money to "try" the Assistants. Besides, I knew every Assistant client. You weren't one. I'd have remembered you. You could be talking about AS/SET. That was a different group. Those guys believed in trying out new things - LOTS of learning curve - then putting them into production on the fly without testing them in a production environment, and not adhering to any reasonable standards. One programmer could barely read another programmer's code. Thus was born AS/SET. Joe
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.