Re: Typical PC Guy question - and request for RFB contacts

["Booth Martin" <Booth@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

 Anthony, it sounds to me like your 3rd party vendor has let you down badly.
 These guys are either incompetant or malicious.  Have they really left you
hanging there by your fingernails?   They should be explaining their
screw-up to your boss, not you.  For them to walk in and destroy your
response times with no warning is a real no-no.

They obviously have a smooth-talker, let their smooth-talker explain it to
your boss.

(Do I sound mean&miserable about this sort of vendor?  you betcha!  I have a
special place in hell reserved for these kind of people.  It involves honey
and long-tongued bears.)


---------------------------------------------------------
Booth Martin   http://www.MartinVT.com
Booth@MartinVT.com
---------------------------------------------------------

-------Original Message-------

From: midrange-l@midrange.com
Date: Thursday, December 05, 2002 12:29:13 PM
To: midrange-l@midrange.com
Subject: Re: Typical PC Guy question - and request for RFB contacts

Last question:

Given a 22.7 shared CPW - any ball park figure as to what percentage would
be system?

I'm trying to relate what kind of performance impact (in some kind of
half-way understandable terms to my president) a hardware upgrade like I
described below will have.

Example (yes . .i know this technically isn't correct:) . .as CPW is a
measurement . . BUT . .for ease of explanation):

On the existing 22.7 shared CPW, the system uses 10 of that 22.7, giving us
a realistic CPW of 12.7.

On the new system, that 10 will be located in the 115 of the 115/25, leaving
the entire 25 available for interactive use, therefore in essence we will
have nearly doubled the interactive power of the system.

The above might not make ANY sense . .hopefully it does:).

Anthony