Re: Typical PC Guy question - and request for RFB contacts -- MIDRANGE-L

another note for the masses before i am flooded -

If you wish to send me contact info, please put "JDCC ISERIES BID" in your
subject and send to me directly at mis@jdcc.edu, so as not to flood the
list.

the new box i am reviewing has 2 8.58G drives . . . .thought mirrored is
likely NOT an option as I am currently using 8G or so (just over 70%) on the
current qty3 4G drives . .. .on the RAID 5 setup . .  i would hope I am
..but there are only 3 drives . . .so . if it works like PC RAID. then no
... .

I can remove s/36, s/38 environments and the migration and migration
assistants . .not sure how much that will free up . .i'm told quite a bit .
. . which might be enough for me to mirror the two drives . which would be
MUCH better than nothing at least.

I am looking forward to each and every response:).


----- Original Message -----
From: "Anthony Hardy" <mis@jdcc.edu>
To: <midrange-l@midrange.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 3:55 PM
Subject: Re: Typical PC Guy question - and request for RFB contacts


> yes . hehe . to its knees .  . . .my mind is in top condition today as you
> can plainly see:).
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Justin Haase" <JHaase@jackhenry.com>
> To: <midrange-l@midrange.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 3:42 PM
> Subject: RE: Typical PC Guy question - and request for RFB contacts
>
>
> > Hard to say unless you figure out where your contention is coming from
> > first.  Generally, you should notice a lot better performance just from
> the
> > hop in model.  However, the 17G DASD has me scared you'll be at only 1
> disk
> > arm (active - should be mirrored to another 17 Gb drive) while your old
> > system leads me to think 4x 4 Gb drives with RAID-5.  So you may have an
> > increase in drive contention.
> >
> > However, generally speaking you should notice an increase in
performance.
> A
> > detailed analysis of contention would need to be done first to figure
out
> > for sure what kind of numbers you'd get.
> >
> > jch
> >
> > ps - did you mean "to it's knees"?
> > pps - be prepared for a barrage of e-mails.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Anthony Hardy [mailto:mis@jdcc.edu]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 3:38 PM
> > To: midrange-l@midrange.com
> > Subject: Typical PC Guy question - and request for RFB contacts
> >
> >
> > This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> > --
> > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
> > I, having very little AS400/iseries experience am in charge of our
current
> > AS400.  I understand fully the impact in performance when I talk in
> > Megahertz, RAM, etc. and have learned a decent amount of IBM lingo,
DASD,
> > main memory, CPW, etc.
> >
> > My question is this .  .our third pary vendor recently made a needed
> change
> > to our administrative software which has our current system at its
needs.
> > We are a higher ed. institution and we have students waiting 3-4 minutes
> for
> > fees to process.
> >
> > Our current machine is a model 600-2129 , 22.7 SHARED CPW, 192 main mem.
> and
> > 12G DASD.
> >
> > I am looking at a refurb 170-2291, 115/25 CPW, 512 main mem and 17G
DASD.
> >
> > Disk space is not an issue for me . .the ONLY thing this box is used for
> is
> > this ONE third party app (no web, mail, storage, etc).  I have been told
> > that this 170 config will push me to the top of the P05 group (don't
want
> to
> > go P10 for budgetary reasons).
> >
> > My questions are this:
> >
> > 1. What kind of performance increase am I looking at generically.  I
know
> > you can't give me exact figures, but in generic terms, are we talking
> about
> > moving from a 386 to a pentium here?  maybe better?  I have some
> performance
> > figures on this box . .but i'm really not interested in specifics .
.just
> > trying to get an overall feel for CPW ratings and the difference they
> make.
> >
> > 2. I need to bid out this project (the hardware, license transfer and
data
> > move).  If you handle this type of thing, please send me your contact
> > information, including name, address, phone, fax and email.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> > Anthony Hardy
> > Director of MIS/Enrollment Management
> > Jefferson Davis Community College
> > (251) 809-1531
> > --
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
> list
> > To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l
> > or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com
> > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> > at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
> list
> > To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l
> > or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com
> > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> > at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>