Re: The Linux Hole

Just checking,

but did not IBM release the code for eclipse that runs identically on both
Linux ( KDE and GNOME ) and windows by writing the screen widgets in C++
(?). Why is it then so difficult to port the OpsNav into such an
environment. I hate it to see "economics" driving this situation.

Regards
Narayanan R Pillai
Senior Technical Architect
American Medical & Life Insurance

----- Original Message -----
From: "Adam Lang" <aalang@rutgersinsurance.com>
To: <midrange-l@midrange.com>
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 11:53 AM
Subject: Re: The Linux Hole


> Well, that is what I was asking.  What is in Ops Navigator that is not
green
> screen?
>
> I honestly do not know.
>
>
> Adam Lang
> Systems Engineer
> Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
> http://www.rutgersinsurance.com
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dr. Syd Nicholson" <sydnic@ccs400.com>
> To: <midrange-l@midrange.com>
> Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 11:39 AM
> Subject: Re: The Linux Hole
>
>
> > I agree with you Adam that Ops Nav is far too slow. Green Screen is
orders
> > of magnitude faster. Green Screen is also easier and less cumbersome.
IBM
> > have some work to do, I think.
> >
> > However, I use Linux for a desktop, and am irritated by the necessity
for
> > Windoze (running in VMWare) to run code and OpsNav.
> >
> > There are many functions in Ops Nav that cannot be done Green Screen,
> > unfortunately, so Windoze is essential.
> >
> > Syd Nicholson
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.