|
Rob, Debating you is fun. I definitely would NOT run Linux on the iSeries, but IBM says it is the way to go and they are always right. I am looking forward to our new iSeries coming in so I can experience the wonderful reliability, enhanced performance and all those additional features (bugs) that everyone else but me seems to appreciate. I unfortunately just appreciate it when things work. By the way, for those considering upgrading, IBM has a new policy to potentially allow you to keep the old system and install the latest OS if you agree to use it as a disaster recovery backup (for $0). :) Waiting did help since the total package is about 33% in $$ of what it would have been 6 months ago with lots of free stuff thrown in. Still probably 75% more than a non-proprietary system but proprietary is good right? On reliability, my experience since 1980 is that System 38s/400s and now iSeries is at best average. Our current mix of servers has only one with a maintenance contract, guess which one... The other servers, including AIX boxes just don't break or if they do cost little to repair. The biggest leap in technology and reliability on the 400 came when IBM adopted PC card tech and moved away from the point to point wired wonders that inhabited the original boxes. Is there any advantage to IBM disk drives on iSeries vs any drive on Unix or Win2k, not really. The only system I have seen with disk related issues in the past few years has been the iSeries. I am encouraged that IBM is adopting more of the PC based technology into the iSeries and dropping the prices as they go. Now if I can just get one with windows on the side, extra fans, water cooling and those neat neon internal lights everything will be spiffy. On the best OS issue, I am torn between DEC's VAX VMS system and Pick OS. Somehow the VAX managed to do with 120 commands what it took OS/400 3000 to do. And with RDB thrown in was a wonderful robust business platform. Pick OS with its built in database still can do things the iSeries cannot even imagine doing. I would classify OS/400 as the best multi-user, multi-tasking system tho. Apple OS X has the best long term potential of all the current contenders. Divsersity in systems allows choice. Konrad
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.