|
Simon Coulter wrote: >While I agree that OpsNav is a pleasant enough interface, especially for >the less technical, it is also slower and less effective for many reasons. >My primary objections to OpsNav are: > 1/ It requires Windoze for which I have no business need. > 2/ IBM provide no alternative to OpsNav-- it is simply stupid to >require the world's least reliable OS to configure and manage the world's >most reliable. > Exactly - Sometimes I wonder at IBMs sanity!!! Syd Nicholson
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.