Re: system event trigger whenever a source file member is updated

["Paul Raulerson" <praulerson@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Oh, there are a *couple* of places - for example, as a pure database server, a 
comparable UNIX server will beat a 400 in speed and
accessibility (using DB/2). If you are in a streams oriented environment, such 
as a system running multiple socket based servers,
UNIX is probably a bit more efficient. (Not to say that a 400 cannot do it, 
just that a $2500
UNIX machine will do it better than an $8K 400.)

And it depends on other factors too. But in *general* - a UNIX server will 
outperform an AS/400 in
a streams environment, and a 400 will outperform UNIX is a record oriented 
environment.

-Paul


----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe Pluta" <joepluta@PlutaBrothers.com>
To: <midrange-l@midrange.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 11:33 AM
Subject: RE: system event trigger whenever a source file member is updated


> > From: Dr Syd Nicholson
> >
> > The system wil be in place for 1-2 years until AS/400s are replaced. The
> > company is centralising its IT and moving to Unix/Oracle.
>
> Syd, I think we'll all be keenly interested to see how this goes.  Please
> drop the list a note from time to time to let us know how the project is
> going.  I'm pretty outspoken in my belief that the AS/400 is the best
> business server available, and I'd be interested to know under what
> circumstances a Unix solution might reasonably replace an AS/400.
>
> Joe
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>
>