|
Tom wrote: >> > Of course it looks as though it's dead in the water as a >> > CFINT killer as Leif tells us the 5250 bit is still set. >> >> What on earth made people think otherwise ? > > Thank you and amen. It was just a silly demo to answer a specific question. Exactly. I didn't expect it to be that easy. I was most curious to see whether the job type would switch from BCH to INT while it was using the acquired terminal. It doesn't. Now the question arises: should a job shown as batch by the system be counted in the interactive CPW? Arguably not, so where is that paid for capacity? Dave... "...and then the different branches of Arithmetic - Ambition, Distraction, Uglification, and Derision." - Lewis Carroll. ======================================================= The opinions expressed in this communication are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of my employer.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
