|
But if they need to gouge the larger machines in order to subsidize the smaller customers then they must be losing money on the smaller customers. If so, then why market to them at all? Rob Berendt ================== "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin Chris Rehm <javadisciple@earth To: midrange-l@midrange.com link.net> cc: Sent by: Fax to: midrange-l-admin@mi Subject: Re: Tierred pricing (was Tiger tools...) drange.com 10/30/2001 02:03 PM Please respond to midrange-l On Tuesday 30 October 2001 10:29 am, Brad Stone wrote: > 1. Besides the fact that it's the "norm", what reasons are > given for the need to price software on a tierred level? Economics of the software vendor. Trying to provide a strong enough revenue stream so that they can stay in business without pricing themselves out of the smaller business markets.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.