RE: ILE performance considerations

["Hall, Philip" <phall@xxxxxxxx>]

Nathan,

You chopped off the posting that this referred to, so I'm confused...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nathan M. Andelin [mailto:nandelin@relational-data.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 1:27 PM
> To: midrange-l@midrange.com
> Subject: Re: ILE performance considerations
>
>
> A quote from Frank Soltis' new book "Fortress Rochester"
> seemed applicable
> to this discussion:
>
> "Bound-by-copy calls let multiple modules be copied together
> into a single
> program.  As we just saw, the program itself is called with a
> dynamic call,
> but then the procedures within any of the modules are called
> with static
> calls.  Because all procedure names are resolved to addresses
> at compile
> time, this type of static call within the program is much
> faster than a
> dynamic call.  The downside of bound-by-copy calls is that
> multiple copies
> of the same module may exist in memory if the module is bound
> into multiple
> programs.  Memory utilization is traded off for better performance."
>
> Nathan M. Andelin
> www.relational-data.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
> (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>