|
>Ian Scotson said >>Rod Orr ( ex IBM) did a blurb on CFINT and how it works on this list not long ago - maybe this can help explain the performance issues.<< My comments were related as to how a specific I/A CPW rating on a non-server model might be quite different to what you need on a server model, not really to how CFINT works. Re upgrading to V4R5, my understanding is that if you are highly utilised on either memory or disk activity (on or approaching the "cusp") then you could get a noticable degradation in performance. If not, then apart from using a little more disk space you shouldn't notice much change (after checking/resetting all your work mgmt parameters!). If you are uncertain as to where your current system sits on the "performance curve" it may be worthwhile collecting performance statistics and getting a performance expert to analyse them. But this (generally) is true of any version/release upgrade (OS/400 or whatever). OS's get fatter as time goes on. Whilst certain areas of performance may be improved by specific software rewrites the number of lines of code and new function increases, inevitably requiring more horsepower at some time. V4R5 wasn't the biggest upgrade but was a bigger incremental change than say V4R4. You should also be more wary if you are intending upgrading multiple releases at once. ________________________________________________ Rod Orr
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.