|
On Wed, 18 July 2001, "Chris Rehm" wrote: > What the appeals court did was to say that the remedy for this illegal > monopoly would have to be reconsidered and that they would not enforce the > order by Judge Jackson that Microsoft be split up. However, the penalty > consideration was sent back to the lower court and could again order break > up. I'm glad to see someone else saying this. I've been wondering if I'd misunderstood the whole appeals ruling. What with all the headlines, etc., stating "Microsoft Not Breaking Up!!" and newsgroup posts seemingly all saying the same, I was beginning to think it must all be over already. (Though the breakup _probably_ is done for, unfortunately.) Tom Liotta -- Tom Liotta The PowerTech Group, Inc. 19426 68th Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 Phone 253-872-7788 Fax 253-872-7904 http://www.400Security.com ___________________________________________________ The ALL NEW CS2000 from CompuServe Better! Faster! More Powerful! 250 FREE hours! Sign-on Now! http://www.compuserve.com/trycsrv/cs2000/webmail/ +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.