× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: RE: The future of computing
  • From: "John Taylor" <john.taylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 23:02:16 -0600
  • Importance: Normal


Chris,


What is your point? That some consultants are incompetent? That some may be
unethical? Personally, I think you're being shortsighted, and drawing
simplistic conclusions. But none of that has anything to do with why I
jumped into the thread, and I have no interest in discussing it.

You claim that the thread is not becoming OS-X vs OS-Y, yet that is the very
foundation of your unethical-consultant argument. Indeed, most of your
message consists of exactly such comparisons.

If the thread manages to rise back above the "NT/Linux/AnyOS SUCKS"
diatribe, then perhaps I'll find something interesting to participate in.


-john




>     The discussion was not "OS-X vs OS-Y." What I thought we were
> discussing
> was the willingness of people to install a solution that is not
> best for the
> customer simply because that is the solution they are familiar
> with and thus
> have income potential from that.
>     When I noted that NT was not as robust as OS/400, I was an
> AS/400 bigot.
> When I noticed that NT didn't measure up to OS/2, I was an OS/2
> bigot. When
> I pointed out that Unix variants seemed to provide more stable and secure
> web service than NT, I was a Linux bigot.
>     Certainly is must be difficult to justify years of installing
> a platform
> that had no other justification for being in the marketplace than
> the market
> influence of the producer. But on the plus side, the next version might
> deliver on the last 9 years of promises.
>     Yeah, I know that all sounds so harsh and attacking, but I am
> just being
> honest. I've used NT and I really think as a consumer operating
> system it is
> in the top 3. I don't really want to run it down because there isn't any
> point.
>     But the mistakes of yesteryear are all behind us. As NT becomes more
> viable I think we all should consider it when and where it is viable.
>     Besides, rumor has it the geniuses at Redmond will soon have a 64-bit
> version!
>
> Chris Rehm
> javadisciple@earthlink.net
> If you believe that the best technology wins the
> marketplace, you haven't been paying attention.
>
>

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.