|
> > Tell me honestly, if you needed a pacemaker and it needed a > computer running > it (from afar), would you rather have an AS/400 running it or an > NT server? Honestly? Neither. > In total honesty, I have felt that the people who deployed NT > server for the > majority of applications in critical locations within enterprises over the > last 9 years are simply willing to rip off their employer for a paycheck. Really? I guess that makes me unethical, selfish, and a disgrace to my profession. > Now, some of those people I am sure convinced themselves that they were > installing the best choice of application server. Some of the > cases, it was > the best choice. But in the majority of cases it was not the best > choice and > the person installing it either did or should have known that to be the > case. And since I'm well acquainted with the AS/400, that makes my decisions irresponsible at best. Perhaps I can chalk it off to my obvious delusions. > The reason I feel so strongly about that is it shames me to think that my > profession is not only populated with the kind of whores who will install > whatever makes them money whether or not it is the best choice, > but that is > exactly the sort of mentality that makes up the lion's share of this > profession. And I presume that an IBM BP selling a low-end 270 with an FSIO-Whatever-it's-called-now as a file/print server would not be considered such a whore? > I feel that there was a time when people would actually research > technology > for a chosen application and would come back to management with what they > felt was the best solution. I feel that it is much more common to just > suggest the solution "I" know most about now. If an AS/400 professional > isn't willing to determine whether or not the AS/400 is the best choice to > deploy the new web app, and the NT professional isn't willing to determine > whether or not NT is the best backbone for the data warehouse, and on down > the line, then they are pretty low. Now I'm confused. Did you just acknowledge that the AS/400 might not be the best choice for everything that involves a computer? > C'mon John, apples and oranges. If the only computers ever made were the > ones being made in 1943, you think there'd be one in every house? > By the way, you should be careful before taking a shot like that > about heads > of corporations, It could lead to some flood of quotes from > current heads of > corporations. And those that chose to do so would only be displaying that they've completely missed the point. It was not a shot at Mr. Watson, or at Jim. It was an example of the dangers inherent in adopting an isolationist attitude. -john +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.