× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: Free OS/400
  • From: "James W. Kilgore" <eMail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 17:46:37 -0700
  • Organization: Progressive Data Systems, Inc.

Joe,

Again I apologize for my hasty slapping together the code for
maintaining a "simple" table. :)

I'm sure that most of us don't do that in real life.

BTW, I forgot where the word "simple" came into play.  Was it that the
table was simple, or programming for it was simple? ;-)

See other comments in line:

Joe Pluta wrote:
> 
> Got it working!  Had to add $BLCMDW48 as well.  It looks great, Mr. Kilgore!
> Pretty intense bit of work with the SQL-style selection parameters.  I'm
> sure there will be issues, but I get the feeling that if I can make THIS
> work, I can make a lot of other things work <grin>.

Please don't be overwhelmed by the fact that there are over 100 source
members (actually I think it's more like 80) to maintain a "simple"
table.  In my application design there are hundreds of tables and ALL of
them use the same /COPY members that you see.  So, each of the hundreds
of table WRK, ADD, EDT, DSP, LST functions have about a >60% code reuse
(that includes the skeleton programs that they were generated from). 
With the two tables presented to you I had to include what the other 198
use.

Write once, use everywhere. ;)


> 
> I'll get back to you after my trip.  Look to see a progress report early
> next week.  The biggest compromise in the first pass may be that the popup
> windows will actually go to a different browser page.

Actually that is the behavior I would expect.  IMO, a 5250 display file
"window" should be a separate, what do you call it? window? Ya that's
it, window!


  But that's a nitpick
> for now.  The other problem is cursor positioning; row and column don't
> translate well to a browser.  But I'll burn that bridge when I get to it.

I'm no expert on Java, from which I understand is what your
"revitalization" tool uses, but if I eliminated the INDARA keyword from
my display files, which AFAIK would result in named fields being passed
back and forth for the indicators, could you use that information to use
getfocus?
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.