RE: QESLINE problem on 270 -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

I was able to recreate the line with IBM's parameters.  The problem is that
I deleted it, recreated it as it was, and now it won't work.  It looks like
the SNDPTFORD command doesn't default to QESLINE, it has some kind of
internal setting that points it to the original line that is deleted.

Art Tostaine, Jr.
CCA, Inc.
Jackson, NJ 08527

-----Original Message-----
From: pnelson@khhcorp.com [mailto:pnelson@khhcorp.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 5:53 PM
To: art@link400.com
Subject: Re: QESLINE problem on 270


If you have another 400 available to you, retrieve the source for QESLINE.
Bring it over to the 270, compile and run it. This should re-create the
line with IBM's parameters.

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.