Re: Active Server Pages

In answer to #4, Yes, it is.
-Bob Buchanan

> "Walden H. Leverich" wrote:
> 
> Andrew,
> 
> There are lots of good reasons to use JSPs, but since you've asked for
> the
> reasons NOT to:
> 
> 10) Don't want to put my 400 directly on the net
> 9) Have a staff that knows ASP but not JSP
> 8) No support for COM/DCOM on JSP on AS/400 (and I have COM/DCOM
> objects I
> need to use)
> 7) Have non-AS/400 data I need to access and can do so MUCH easier
> from NT
> 6) Have non-AS/400 data that I simply can't access from AS/400
> (Exchange
> Server)
> 5) Rest of corporate intra/extra/internet deployed on IIS, why use
> both?
> 4) Reliability - I know the 400 is more stable than NT, but is it more
> 
> stable than 5 NT servers?
> 3) Easy to find hosting locations that support ASP
> 2) Hard to find hosting locations that support AS/400s
> 
> -and the number one reason to use ASP over JSP on the AS/400:
> 1) Bill simply isn't rich enough yet!
> 
> -Walden
> 

<snipped>
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---