|
At 15:40 09/08/2000 , Bob Buchanan wrote: >In answer to #4, Yes, it is. >...snip > > "Walden H. Leverich" wrote: ...snip > > 4) Reliability - I know the 400 is more stable than NT, but is it more > > stable than 5 NT servers? I always thought that too, until I recently went to work in an NT/AS400 shop that has some really competent network folks. NT works pretty well on the whole. It's still not as bullet proof as the AS/400, but it's not too shabby. About the only time a server goes down is when one of the remote sites gets struck by lightning or some idiot starts sending love messages. Pete Hall pbhall@execpc.com http://www.execpc.com/~pbhall/ +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
