Re[2]: Correlating *SAVF "records" to FTP job I/O count

[eric.delong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

     Hmmm, I believe this definitely fits the "right tool for the job" 
     category. Some thoughts on why NOT to use SAVRSTxxx commands:
     
     1. More shops going fully TCP/IP.
     2. Need to transmit to remote host via the internet.
     3. Need to transmit to non-as400 hosts as well.
     
     Don't get me wrong, the SAVRSTxxx commands are great timesavers, 
     given the proper environment. They aren't, however, your one-stop 
     solution to file/object distribution. 
     
     jmo,
     eric.delong@pmsi-services.com


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________

     
So, I don't get it.  Why would anyone choose using FTP to transmit objects 
across AS/400s over SAVRSTOBJ?
     


+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---