Re[4]: Correlating *SAVF "records" to FTP job I/O count

[eric.delong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

     The SAVRSTxxx commands are built to use SNADS under the cover. I 
     realize that anynet can be used to support SNA over IP, but that's 
     not really going to be very efficient. Actually, #1 and #2 are 
     essentioally the same problem, though #1 could be relaxed by using 
     anynet, assuming that the network supports this. 
     
     Sorry about the confustion, Just picking nits here... :)
     
     eric.delong@pmsi-services.com


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: RE: Re[2]: Correlating *SAVF "records" to FTP job I/O count 
Author:  <MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com> at INET_WACO
Date:    5/8/00 5:06 PM


Well, re: #3, I _did_ specify AS/400-to-AS/400.  <g>
     
But, otherwise, it is my uneducated guess that whenever I can use FTP for 
AS/400-to-AS/400 object transfers, I can also use the SAVRSTOBJ command. 
Your #2 makes it sound like that is not the case.
     
You and I agree on using the "right tool for the job".  How would this 
affect your #1?
     
- Dan Bale
     
> -----Original Message-----
> From: eric.delong@pmsi-services.com [SMTP:eric.delong@pmsi-services.com] 
> Sent: Monday, May 08, 2000 3:52 PM
> To:   MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> Subject:      Re[2]: Correlating *SAVF "records" to FTP job I/O count 
> 
>      Hmmm, I believe this definitely fits the "right tool for the job" 
>      category. Some thoughts on why NOT to use SAVRSTxxx commands:
>      
>      1. More shops going fully TCP/IP.
>      2. Need to transmit to remote host via the internet. 
>      3. Need to transmit to non-as400 hosts as well.
>      
>      Don't get me wrong, the SAVRSTxxx commands are great timesavers, 
>      given the proper environment. They aren't, however, your one-stop 
>      solution to file/object distribution. 
>      
>      jmo,
>      eric.delong@pmsi-services.com 
> 
> ______________________________ Reply Separator 
> _________________________________
> 
> So, I don't get it.  Why would anyone choose using FTP to transmit objects 
> 
> across AS/400s over SAVRSTOBJ?
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. 
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. 
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com 
+---
     


+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---