RE: CUM 0049440 -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Hi Ken,

We applied that CUM on March 18. Only problem so far was with Client Access
which was fixed by PTF SF60284 and an IPL.

Did you happen to also apply the database PTF's SF99104?  According to our
coverletter, it was required to apply this immediately after the CUM. 

Cyndi Bradberry
IHFA
Boise, ID

-----Original Message-----
From: Graap, Ken [mailto:keg@exchange.gasco.com]

I applied the latest V4R4 CUM PTF package last night. 

Our system response time has gone to hell...

Our average prior to the CUM was 0.20 - 0.25 seconds per transaction. 

We are seeing some response times of up to 5 minutes per transaction. 

Thank goodness it is intermittent, but it is still happening quite often.

Has anyone else applied CUM C0049440? if so have you noticed any performance
problems?
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.