RE: CUM 0049440

["Shaw, David" <dshaw@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ken,

We have it loaded.  We didn't notice any substantial hit on response times from
it.  We put on the latest group PTF's for HIPERs and DB2 at the same time,
though, so we may have loaded the correction at the same time as the problem.
With everything I've heard lately about the cumes, I wouldn't load one without
putting the groups on at the same time.

Dave Shaw
Spartan International, Inc.
Spartanburg, SC

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Graap, Ken [mailto:keg@exchange.gasco.com]
> 
> Hello ....
> 
> I applied the latest V4R4 CUM PTF package last night. 
> 
> Our system response time has gone to hell...
> 
> Our average prior to the CUM was 0.20 - 0.25 seconds per transaction. 
> 
> We are seeing some response times of up to 5 minutes per transaction. 
> 
> Thank goodness it is intermittent, but it is still happening 
> quite often.
> 
> Has anyone else applied CUM C0049440? if so have you noticed 
> any performance
> problems?
> 
> These problems "MAY" be related to file opens, but we aren't sure yet.
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---