× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: V4R4 upgrade without upgrading CA for Win 95/NT
  • From: Larry Bolhuis <lbolhui@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2000 15:44:27 -0500
  • Organization: Arbor Solutions, Inc

David,

  I can tell you that V3R1M3 of CA will work on a V4R4 system with little 
problem
but no new functionality. As you are already planning the migration to Express
you are on the right track for sure.  Since the XD1 product is the CLIENT side 
of
the 'older' CA if you don't upgrade it, it will sit there at V3R1M3 so your PC
users who still run the Check Version won't be asked to upgrade. Unless you are
actually using the AS/400 for loading PTFs to the clients I would recommend that
you simply remove the XD1 product from your system prior to the upgrade. The
existance of XD1 on the AS/400 is not required to run it on the client side.

  You will want to make sure the XE1 product gets loaded during the upgrade as
that is the Express Version.

  - Larry

"Shaw, David" wrote:
> 
> Hey, y'all!
> 
> We're upgrading our machine from V4R2 to V4R4 this Sunday.  As part of that,
> we're installing Client Access Express with a view of migrating our users to
> that within the next month or two.  We're currently running V3R1M3 of CA for
> 95/NT.  If we do a "normal" V4R4 upgrade, the version on the /400 will be
> replaced with V3R2M0.  We would rather not do that at this time, since it 
>makes
> no sense to deal with all the PC's in seven remote locations twice, 
>particularly
> since we have many users who are not experienced with PC software installs.  
>Is
> it safe to tell the machine NOT to upgrade 5763XD1?  We won't be applying any
> more PTF's to V3R1M3, since we already have the most recent and supposedly 
>final
> service pack installed on it, so I can't think of any reason why it might 
>cause
> us problems.  Has anyone done this, or does anyone have any ideas about it?
> Thanks in advance!

-- 
Larry Bolhuis         |         What if it's True?
Arbor Solutions, Inc  |
(616) 451-2500        |  
(616) 451-2571 -fax   | 
lbolhui@ibm.net       |
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.