|
I tend to agree. Soon after Java came out (maybe a year or two) I was looking for compilers to buy. I saw Delphi (Pascal) for $79, VC++ for $190 or so, and J++ for $29. I only had a little over a hundred with me, so I bought the Delphi (which we at that point used at work) and J++ 1.0, figuring $29 was enough to waste if it wasn't any good. I took both home and installed them, and was writing programs in Delphi rather quickly (inside 1/2 an hour, as I already knew the language and compiler). Then I turned to J++ (Microsoft's first version of Java I believe) and tried to work with it. I had a real application I wanted to write, a family tree program I could stick on my home page and let people "browse" my family tree and add any entries they knew about (which I would research and make sure they were correct before applying). After a week or so of trying to get the very first piece done, showing a picture of a tree I had found, I gave up. It would work in IE, but not in Netscape. And even in IE it didn't do it the way I wanted it to, even though I was following the examples, and searching news groups, etc.. 1.0 of just about anything is horrible, I understand. But unless you want to pay to be a beta tester (I usually beta test for free) stay away from very new technology unless you have a very pressing reason to use it immediately. It will always take so much more resources to do something in a "new" language than in a tried and true language, just because it's been extensively debugged through use, for one thing, and a lot of the tools have already been written. In fact, I think I still have the Microsoft J++ 1.0 set at home. What to do with it? Think it'll be a collectors item some day? lol Regards, Jim Langston "L. S. Russell" wrote: > Nobody is saying ignore XML, just let it mature. Bandwagon jumpers > should learn to use a little restraint. > "Anybody who has every tried to implement EDI knows that the X12 > standard", he says with a chuckle "is anything but standard." And yet, > thanks to all the bandwagon jumpers, and corporate profit centers we are > forced to re-map ASN's for each and every freakin new customer. > And so far XML is only slightly less disjointed a standard "again > laughing". +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.