• Subject: RE: Release License API Ethics
  • From: "Bob Randall" <BLR@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 9 Nov 1999 14:49:55 -0600
  • Importance: Normal

I can tell by your answer I neglected one very important factor. I am the
customer, not the vendor. I am maintaining software not licensed
"concurrent" but I have the ability to delete user licenses. By deleting
licenses I will be causing it to appear as concurrent.

So, what I mean by wrong is, is it close enough to illegal I should not do
it. I think the point is moot, it looks like I need a key from the vendor to
do this via a program. I can continue to do it manually though.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-midrange-l@midrange.com
> [mailto:owner-midrange-l@midrange.com]On Behalf Of Jim Langston
> Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 1999 11:42 AM
> To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> Subject: Re: Release License API Ethics
> What do you mean by "wrong"?  And if you tell your customers you
> are licensing it concurrent, and you license it concurrent, what could
> possibly be "wrong" in that?
> This all depends on a number of factors.
> 1. Are you licensing the software the same way you did when your
>     customers originally bought the software?


| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2020 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].