× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: Release License API Ethics
  • From: Jim Langston <jlangston@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 09 Nov 1999 09:41:59 -0800
  • Organization: Conex Global Logistics Services, Inc.

What do you mean by "wrong"?  And if you tell your customers you
are licensing it concurrent, and you license it concurrent, what could
possibly be "wrong" in that?

This all depends on a number of factors.

1. Are you licensing the software the same way you did when your
    customers originally bought the software?
2. If you are not licensing it the same way, does this incur a higher
    cost on your customers?  I don't think it's "right" to tell someone
    their software will cost them $1000 a year when they buy it, then
    charge them $2000 a year.
3. What do you mean by "goes back to using the software" and
    "re-issued a license"?  Goes back to using it after a day?  After
    a year?  After a month?  Reissue a license from your company?
    From the software itself?  Does the user have to re-pay for this
    license?  This part is totally unclear.
4. I feel if you sell someone a product, and tell them what their
    costs are going to be, I fell it's not "right" to start charging them
    more than originally stated.  In fact, I think you are legally required
    to maintain the cost, as long as upgrades et al are not included.

Regards,

Jim Langston

Bob Randall wrote:

> I did not get a reply to this the first time, it must have been to large of
> a message with 2 questions. This is the condensed version with just the
> ethics question.
>
> I am attempting to release a software license through a program. I normally
> use the manual method which is OK. When that person goes back to using the
> software they get re-issued a license. Is it wrong to release the license
> through a program like this, thus effectively introducing something like
> concurrent licensing?
>
> TIA,
> Bob Randall
>
> +---
> | This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
> david@midrange.com
> +---
>
> +---
> | This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
> +---

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.