• Subject: Re: CHGTELNA
  • From: Jeffrey Stevens <jstevens@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 09 Nov 1999 09:36:41 -0500
  • Organization: IBM Corp.

> Date: Mon, 08 Nov 1999 20:44:31 -0500
> From: Larry Bolhuis <lbolhui@ibm.net>
> Subject: Re: CHGTELNA
> Terry,
> Seems to me that I read in a PTF cover letter where they enable the timemark
> timeout to actually work that this thing is in effect until that telnet 
> is dropped.  Therefore it would not have the desired effect on users already
> connected.  

The Timemark timeout has always worked, the PTF you are thinking of simply makes
it work more quickly.  However, the Timemark setting is for testing the client
connection, not the local activity.  QINACTITV tests the local activity.  Both
will close a Telnet connection, so the lower of the two wins.

J.S. (Jeffrey) Stevens  AS/400 TCP/IP (Telnet/WSG/LPD)
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2019 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].