• Subject: Re: ROCHESTER PUSHES BACK 2000 ANNOUNCE DATE
  • From: "Luther Ananda Miller" <luther.miller@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 29 Oct 1999 22:04:06 +0200

I can understand IBM pushing back the new OS release, and I think it is a good idea. I am not sure what new features they are planning to add- critical new features can be added with service packs anyway. They have added quite a bit over the last couple of releases, and I think it needs time both to stabilize and for IBM to get feedback on the new features and determine what direction customers want them take. There have been a lot of enhancements via DB2 UDB (UDFs, UDTs, consildated code, etc.) and of course HTTP/WebSphere/Java etc.
 
Luther
-----Original Message-----
From: Glenn Ericson <Glenn-Ericson@att.net>
To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com <MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com>
Date: Friday, 29 October 1999 10:37
Subject: ROCHESTER PUSHES BACK 2000 ANNOUNCE DATE

Was Feb 00

ROCHESTER PUSHES BACK 2000 ANNOUNCE DATE
...

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2022 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.