I couldn't agree more. I have been biting my toungue during this discussion so far. I am not saying that screens cannot get the job done. But I would rather have a really cool looking GUI that was fully functional than a text based GUI that was fully functional. I am definitely not saying that a POORLY designed gui is better than a text based screen. I have been designing GUIs for 6 years and I have also designed data entry screens (GUI) -- just because a data entry program is a GUI doesn't mean it is going to be hard to use. Sure, there are poorly made GUIs out there that are not suited to data entry. Just as there are crappy pick up trucks. But if you want a pickup truck, does that mean you should not get one just because some of them are crappy? Of course not. I have also seen excellent data entry GUIs where the users have keystrokes for everything they need and they fly along keying in data as fast as they can type. Obviously, there are some applications which can only be performed with a GUI -- applications which show photos, do modeling, etc. But the bottom line is that most people prefer to use a nicer looking application. Some GUIs might be poorly designed, but don't throw out the baby with the bathwater. For me, there is no comparison. And GUI sells. Luther -----Original Message----- From: HwaRangRon@aol.com <HwaRangRon@aol.com> To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com <MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com> Date: Friday, 29 October 1999 14:28 Subject: Re: AS/400 vs. NT >In a message dated 10/28/99 6:31:07 PM Pacific Daylight Time, >email@example.com writes: > ><< I find it interesting that the AS/400 vs. NT topic becomes a 5250 text > vs. GUI topic. They really aren't the same thing excepting that we see it > that way. > > AS/400 can do GUI and text while NT seems to be pretty much GUI-centric. >>> > >As/400 can do a pale imitation of GUI only. Show me a 3 dimensional rotating >gant chart in green screen. Can't be done. Why would I need a 3 dimensional >rotating gant chart, you ask? Because sex sells. > >We sell a medical billing package consisting of about 3000 screens and 1 >million or so lines of ILE RPG code. When the package was green screen only, >we couldn't get anybody into the booths at the trade shows to see the >package, regardless of the features that it has. We "GUI"ized the product (we >chose SEAGUL, but any guie product would do) and now we pack em in. Sales are >going through the roof. We haven't added any more functionality to the >package, we simply modernized the look with a gui tool. > >Green screens can not compete with PC's. We should use the presentation >abilities of the PC's - after all, that's what they do best. Use the AS/400 >for storing data (safely, reliably, with fast access). That's what it does >best. > >Ron Hawkins +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: firstname.lastname@example.org +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.