× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: Citrix
  • From: Rob Berendt <rob@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 8:09:57 -0500

When you mention the 400 part, were you talking about a product that ran 
on the Citrix server, or, were you talking about the 5250 option available 
on the Netstation itself?  Or running the netstation 5250 part in 
conjunction with Citrix?  Because we've been running the 5250 part since 
the netstations were in beta.  There are pros and cons.  Pro is that the 
netstations had named sessions long before Client Access.  Con is that 
we have an open problem where this sometimes goes a little flaky.  
Telnet5250 products that we've been looking at, to run on the Citrix 
server, do not currently support named sessions.  Yes, I could probably 
do that with the exit point programming but I was hoping to avoid that. 





MBOCEANSIDE@postoffice.worldnet.att.net on 05/24/99 05:34:12 PM
Please respond to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com@Internet
To:     MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com@Internet
cc:      
Fax to: 
Subject:        Re: Citrix

Rob Berendt wrote:
> 
> We are starting to dabble with Citrix.  We had a gentleman from Sun Data
> come up and install it.  So far we are very impressed.  One of our PC
> technicians was amazed that a 386 was blowing the doors off of his P2-300
> with 192mb of ram.  We are also using several netstations.  So far it is
> fast, fast, fast.  Someone said 'man, this loads Notes faster than my PC'.
> The above PC technician has a netstation next to his P2 and the boss
> stopped by and the technician jumped on to the Netstation to fix the boss's
> problem with NT administration.

I trust this a newer version of the product IBM recommended in the early
days of the Network Station... I put this in a customer site about two
years ago and it proved to be a disaster.. I will say, that IF you only
run pc apps., it will run quite nice, but when you throw the IBM version
that does the 400 part, things went down hill very quickly... They were
putting out PTF's on a daily basis... The Network administrator portion
was where all the problems came in.... BUT.... just pc apps and NO 400,
it
ran like a scalded dog.... You could run 5250 emulation pretty well, but
when you mixed the environment.... strange things continued to happen...
but that's what I get for bleeding edge stuff... I assume it's much
better now.... the network station seems to have died down a LOT.

Again... I assume this is the same product....
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.