|
We have had mixed results with the 3130. The first year or so had a new release of microcode every week, and a batch of PTFs for the 400 about as frequently. It is also pretty fussy about the paper quality and the operating environment. If you create the LAN attached printer as a physical device (not as a remote outq) the printer acts very much like a twinax attached device. Buck Calabro Billing Concepts, Albany, NY > -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Schaefer > Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 1999 5:32 PM > To: midrange-l@midrange.com > Subject: IPDS/AFP Printing > > We are considering acquiring AFP/400 to work in conjunction with > either IBM's 3130 or Infoprint 40 laser printers. > > Question #1: > The AFP sales literature indicates that AFP/IPDS printing over a > LAN has similar error recovery as a twinax attached line printer. Is > this so? > > Question #2: > Does anyone have experience with both the 3130 and Infoprint 40? > I'm wondering if the 3130 is more reliable. It surely is more > expensive. > +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.