Re: ASCII workstation controller

Well, 9600 IS Slow! However, even thought the AWC will configure to 38,400 bps, 
you can't really get
any thoughput advantage beyond a 14,400 modem.

ONLY Advantage of AWC is ability to be in the controlling subsystem from home.  
There are other ways
to do this now with PC Console etc if that is a concern.

I'd move to a LAN based solution. ie Shiva Lan-Rover, Perle 833, or even NT RAS 
if you like NT.  All
of these solutions can keep your 28,800 or better modem running flat out.  I 
like to say: 'Better
than being there'.

Larry Bolhuis
Arbor Solutions, Inc
lbolhui@ibm.net

boothm@ibm.net wrote:
> 
> On an AS/400 at V3R7, with an ASCII workstation controller, and a 9600 baud 
>modem, what is the right way to connect?  The client is using Dial-3x and 
>complains of it being painfully slow.
> 
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> boothm@ibm.net
> Booth Martin
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> +---
> | This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
> +---
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---