|
Eric, In a message dated 98-06-22 20:18:06 EDT, you write: > DDM is MUCH more useful for transferring PF data between systems. I > even use it to pass source code. It's easy to write some simple > utilities to facilitate file transfer. Also a lot faster than SNADS. <<snip>> This raises a curious question that I had just the other day. We have DDM running between both a 530 (V3R7) and a 310 (V3R2) as well as between a 320 (V3R2) and the same 310. When you perform DSPPFM on these, both <PAGE DOWN> and B (bottom) absolutely _scream_ performance-wise. Yet, once at the bottom, <PAGE UP> is slower than a B10 with one drive, 8 meg of memory, and 100 attached devices. Why is <PAGE UP> so much slower than <PAGE DOWN>? Just Curious... Dean Asmussen Enterprise Systems Consulting, Inc. Fuquay-Varina, NC USA E-Mail: DAsmussen@aol.com "Be like a postage stamp -- stick to one thing until you get there." -- Margaret Carty +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.