|
>>> "Cynthia M. Kovarik" <ckovarik@bellsouth.net> 04/06/98 09:53pm >>> > If you can provide me with your translations for the OSI model, I > would be more than happy to provide you with the "sum total" > received and perhaps an analogy for senior management. ------------------------ I can't recall specifically which layer does what (other than the absolute bottom one (7th?) being the actual hardware interface), but try this for an understandable analogy: Stuff (documents, E-mails, etc.) flying about a computer network are like letters going through the mail. Any letter sent anywhere goes through several steps: 1) sender writes the letter & puts it in an addressed envelope 2) post man (or UPS or FedEx or whomever) picks it up 3) post office sorts it in the appropriate mail bag for it's destination 4) mail bag is placed on conveyance to get letter to where it's going 5) at destination, bag is taken from conveyance to correct post office 6) post office puts letter in correct bag for delivery 7) post man delivers mail to final destination 8) recipient opens & reads sender's letter. Putting a 300Mhz Pentium/64MB/24X CD ROM/starfleet duotronic component compatible PC on the desktops means steps 1 & 8 take a total of about .0003 picoseconds. But if the post man in step 2 is a procrastinating centenarian with lumbago who's letter bag only holds 4 envelopes at a time, the post office in step 3 is hampered by custodian's local 347 sit down strike as well as a flood of cards for Groundhog's day, the conveyance chosen in step 4 is the Pony Express, and the recipient has 400 other E-mails to read before he gets to your letter, then it takes a looong time for the message to get through, much less for you to see a response. Point is, there's lots of stuff happening between person A clicking the mouse button and server B actually getting the mouse click event, much less responding to it. Layers of addressing abstraction have to be resolved by things like routers (each mail bag probably has an address (a number or some such) saying "I go to Detroit or Boston or Paducah" over and above the actual address on the envelope.) Lots of traffic on the network itself (the Groundhog's day cards) can slow down an individual message as well as increase the time it takes to get the server to respond (the 400 E-mails.) Outages at any point force packets to be re-routed (the custodian's strike.) Older & slower transmission technology (our ancient postman) and/or insufficient bandwidth (his very small letter bag) gum up the works too. Bottlenecks at any of the intermediate points slows the whole process down, regardless of how golliwog state of the art the desktop is. Makes sense to me anyway - I've found the more outre the analogy, the better chance it has of sticking in people's minds (and livens up dry IS topics to boot :)) Scott Cornell Mercy Information Systems +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.