Re: Conversion to ILE

>> "Being no RPG expert, I naturally assumed there should be an explicit
variable type specifier for an RPG III array. Now I undestand this feature has
only been introduced in RPG IV. Or am I wrong again?" <<

You are correct, not wrong <bg>.  In RPG IV we were able to get away from the E
spec and I spec data definitions and that gave us the flexibility to fix a lot
of these kinds of things.

Don't feel bad - I wasn't convinced myself until I'd pumped both set of code
through the Code/400 verifier - I LOVE that baby - it makes life away from an
AS/400 so much simpler!


Jon Paris - AS/400 AD Market Support - paris@ca.ibm.com
Phone: (416) 448-4019   -   Fax: (416) 448-4414
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---