Re: Gateway vs IBM PCs -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

We have standardized on GW2K machines because of their reliability and service. We've been using them since the 386 was top dog and have about 60 or so ranging from 386's running Windows 3.x, Pentiums running Win95 and NT, and Pentium Pros running NT as file, print & application servers.
(Who says you have to buy those so called server systems for departmental servers? We saved big money and didn't lose any performance by going with some beefed up GW2K PPros).

Rob Ward
M-C Industries, Inc.
----------
>
> A VP at our company recently proposed that the folks he is
> responsible for start using Gateway 2K PCs, in large part because of
> their initial costs. Our current policy is we get all IBM PCs (In an
> effort to be as standardized as possible). We are in the process of
> moving most users from OS/2 to Windoze 95.
>
> Any comments about the hardware piece of this equation?
>
> - Doug Barnes -

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.