jfranz wrote:

For what purpose would a happy programmer leave a stable job??? To risk your financial
health for 10k more??

The basic answer is that they wouldn't (assuming that we're ignoring the "10k more" general direction). And that implies that the programmer who leaves is no longer "happy".

Lots of things can cut happiness until it's gone and is replaced by dissatisfaction.

I left one job because it became clear that the CISC system environment was never going to be upgraded to RISC. You can coast for quite a while at V3R2; there was a _lot_ to investigate in version 3, but it eventually fades.

I left another job specifically because a department manager overruled a decision of mine; a particularly disruptive service problem was a direct result over the next weekend and I was particularly pleased as I laid the logs and traces on his desk and told him why it was his responsibility to fix. That was actually a 'final straw'; a few other troubling elements had arisen in prior months having to do with management-staff trust.

My first real job in this industry was with a multi-billion-dollar, multi-national, Dow-Jones 50 Industrials company. It was as "stable" as any job ever could be and I could have maintained "financial health" for as long as I wanted. (You can always find positions to move in to in companies that size.)

I'd been there, doing well, for near five years when a friend asked if I'd consider coming in to a little start-up he'd been running. It was an obvious major risk.

Around the same time, the corporate V-P responsible for our division had been making speeches from headquarters on the east coast to employees, telling us all that minor restructuring was coming to realign various units in little ways that wouldn't be much noticed by any of us. As I watched tapes of him (before The Internet and what have you) and listened to how he talked, I kept getting the uneasy feeling that he resembled the U.S. Attorney General a while earlier saying 'all is well; no one has done anything criminal' in the months before Nixon resigned.

My thoughts were tumbling around the concept of 'financial security' and it was obvious that sticking with my current job was where that 'security' was. But somewhere during that weekend of decision, the thought came to me "*I* am my security!" And it has never left my mind since then. I realized that I _never_ should assign my own security to anyone else. And I turned in my resignation the next week and haven't regretted it one bit.

Life was tough at a number of points for years after.

OTOH, within a year, the local previous-employer site had closed down and the data center had moved to Portland, OR, some 50 miles south. Most of the developers spent quite a while scrambling to find new jobs while I'd been building relationships in the area for over a year. Those who moved with the data center got another surprise some 18 months later when there was a second move to Dallas, TX.

I could've had "financial health" in an unbroken string. I chose physical and mental health instead.

It took a lot of time and effort, but "financial health" came out of the relationships I formed. It doesn't come from a "stable job". It comes from being a stable individual regardless of the job.

This is the U.S.A. It _is_ the 'land of opportunity'. It is what you make of it. It never should be how much you make in a job; it's what you _do_ with what you make.

Tom Liotta

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2021 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.