|
On 16/05/2008, at 9:04 AM, Paul Jackson wrote:
Sorry, I was a bit premature with that statement. The pointers are at
the normal position but for some reason it seems as if the SETSPPFP
.WCBSPC, .WCB-TABLES(THE-TABLE); statement is not setting .WCBSPC
properly as the based on structure is all hex zeros.
That's very odd. Can you recompile it with debuggable identifiers and
determine what .WCBSPC is set to before and after the SETSPPFP
operation?
You said you were running this on VRM540, QSECURITY=40, and program
set to system-state. I compiled on 510, set system state (including
proper checksums) and tried it and it worked. I then saved the
program and test program, restored on VRM540, and tried it, and it
worked,
So the code seems fine--although it's not the most efficient way of
locating a given job.
I wonder what else is different on the failing system? Same level of
LIC? Same Cume level?
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.