|
Jim Langston wrote: > I'm sure there'd be lots of things faster, but with the increased speed of > computers, more people are coding for ease of maintainability and speed of > programming more than speed of execution. Ease of maintenance was the reason I wouldn't "reinvent the wheel". At least our goal is the same. :) I would have thought it easier and more readable to use system API's (and hopefully with less debugging). Of course you may sometimes need memory allocation routines, but I would have considered writing service programs providing "higher level routines" so that the need to use memory allocation routines directly would be minimized. If IBM had provided service programs for dynamic array/list support I guess most shops would never had to use the malloc routines at all.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.