Good News Everybody!
The new search engine is LIVE!
Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.
|
Jim Langston wrote: > I could think of a few uses. > > 1. I have a buffer I am using that, currently, is 1000 bytes. > I've used up > 500 bytes so far. I want to add an element that's 600 bytes. Rather than > add 100 bytes to the end, re-allocate 600 bytes from byte 501. What's the difference? Don't you get bytes 501 to 1100 either way? > 2. I have a buffer of records that are 100 bytes each, and I have > 10 so far, > for 1000 bytes. I want to add a record into the middle. Rather than add > the 100 bytes at the end and shift the records from 5 to 10 to the next > record, just add 100 bytes in the middle. > 3. I want to delete a record in the middle as the above scenario. Wouldn't user indexes be faster for this type of application?
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.