|
On 17 Jan 2002 at 16:28, Gene_Gaunt@ReviewWorks.com wrote: > > >> "If anything were to go wrong with the program after sending the > >> *RQS message but before receiving it to make it old, the request > >> will be processed after the program ends... and I don't like that." > > Then run your programs under your own custom routing entry program > instead of QCMD. Then you will be able to stop those dangling request > messages from running as CL commands if programs fail. Thanks, Gene. I considered that. But it's not the biggest problem. The biggest problem I see is that when a person presses F9, of course, *RQS messages are recalled. This includes any *RQS messages that were sent via my "tool." This effect, I don't think there's an acceptable circumvention for, and for the unwary user, it could cause problems. I might as well switch to *INFO messages and be done with it... but I figured this would be the one place where I'd find out enough internal information to be able to simulate the LOGCLPGM(*YES) effect. How disappointing that IBM doesn't seem to provide any means for that! Anyway, I do appreciate the reply. Thanks! -- Qiu Min & Dennis Lovelady mail: dennis@lovelady.com URL: http://www.lovelady.com ICQ: 5734860 -- "I studied the lives of great men and famous women, and I found that the men and women who got to the top were those who did the jobs they had in hand, with everything they had of energy and enthusiasm and hard work." - Harry S. Truman
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.