RE: An introduction to MI by example II (part B)...

[Leif Svalgaard <l.svalgaard@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I take your points. They make sense from a compiler writer's point of view.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jon.Paris@halinfo.it [SMTP:Jon.Paris@halinfo.it]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 1999 10:23 AM
> To:   MI400@midrange.com
> Subject:      Re: An introduction to MI by example II (part B)...
> 
> 
> 
>  >> This is what the authors of 'The optimizing translator' at
> http://as400.rochester.ibm.com/beyondtech/translator.htm
> say about MI:
> 
> I don't believe that they are talking about MI in exactly the same context
> (i.e.
> the language) that you are, but I'll call it quits and just keep quiet. I
> can't
> resist the temptation though to point out that both myself (former IBM
> compiler
> developer) and Hans Boldt (current IBM compiler developer) have both made
> the
> same points.
> +---
> | This is the MI Programmers Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to MI400@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to MI400-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MI400-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
> dr2@cssas400.com
> +---
+---
| This is the MI Programmers Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MI400@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MI400-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MI400-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: dr2@cssas400.com
+---