× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: RE: An introduction to MI by example II (part B)...
  • From: Leif Svalgaard <l.svalgaard@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 12:53:30 -0600

I also think I'll keep quiet on this topic as it does not bring us any
further.
I'm of course kidding myself into believing I'm closer to the machine.
I don't want to be. I just want to use MI as a tool when it makes
sense to.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jon.Paris@halinfo.it [SMTP:Jon.Paris@halinfo.it]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 1999 10:17 AM
> To:   MI400@midrange.com
> Subject:      Re: An introduction to MI by example II (part B)...
> 
> 
> 
>  >> MI (old and new) is what defines the virtual machine that *is* the
> AS/400.
> 
> You are taking this way too seriously. The AS/400 is brilliant - agreed
> 100% but
> MI does not define the virtual machine.
> 
> It was, as I said, an intermediate language output by the compilers that
> IBM
> allowed (or not at different times) people to use directly. I suspect that
> if C
> had been available back on the S/38 that users would never have been
> allowed to
> use MI, but that is speculation on my part.
> 
> Even if I were to accept the argument that MI defined the VM - that would
> _only_
> be true of CISC machines with the two level microcode. MI is no more
> native to
> the RISC boxes than COBOL or RPG. On RISC, the closest to "real" MI you
> can get
> is MI-prime, which as I noted before is a derivative of W-code. IBM will
> make
> this available but only for a fee - last time I heard they wanted
> $1,000,000 !!!
> 
> Let me reiterate my point. There is nothing wrong with programming in MI,
> just
> as there is nothing wrong with programming in RPG, COBOL, Java or anything
> else.
> Just don't kid yourself that you are coding to the machine. If this were
> the
> case don't you think that IBM would still be having their compilers
> generate MI?
> The fact that IBM's own tools no longer do so should give you the hint.
> +---
> | This is the MI Programmers Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to MI400@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to MI400-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MI400-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
> dr2@cssas400.com
> +---
+---
| This is the MI Programmers Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MI400@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MI400-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MI400-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: dr2@cssas400.com
+---


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.