Re: XA Licensing

[Hans Koens <hkoens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

We also have a 520 and we have an lpar system.
We run OS400 lpar and a Linux lpar.
When we moved to this environment we didn't have to do any specific for 
the license because of the lpar.
We have a rel6 en 7 version of Mapics and nothing specific about lpar.
On the other hand we have some other licensed programs, which we need to 
order the specifick lpar version.(+++$$$$$$)
So for Mapics you should be ok.
I even think it's the same when you have 2 or more OS400 lpar running 
Mapics.

Regards,

Hans



Morrison, Doug wrote:
> We currently have System i5 model 520 without any LPAR's.  Our XA
> license is a 200 concurrent user.  We are considering an upgrade to our
> system that would allow us to create LPAR's.  We are also considering
> moving our test environment to a second LPAR.  So my question is would
> we need to have a second license to run a test environment in a
> different LPAR?  A second question would be if we have a second LPAR but
> don't run XA in it is there still any licensing concerns?
>
>  
>
> Thanks
>
> Doug
>
>  
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MAPICS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mapics-l
> or email: MAPICS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.
>
>