× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



David,

It is my understanding that the problem is a bit
larger. If you have several revisions and you
maintain a back level one, or just maintain one,
pick any one, that one gets sent to PDM regardless
of revision number. So in our case when we were
trying to maintain different purchase prices by
revision, typically the item master c record that
purchasing uses was incorrect. It depended on what
was maintained last and who maintained it.

We have also had to adopt the policy of effectivity
dating out an old revision and effectivity dating
in a new revison or deleting the old revision.
Otherwise the rest of MAPICS can get way confused
since when two component parts are equally effective
if not part of the active EPDM bill it will chose the
first.

So it would be real nice to have revision in the rest
of the MFG apps but I don't expect it anytime soon.

Anyone find any other good workarounds?

Regards

Konrad




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.