× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Patrick,

I was in a similar situation at our company.  We weren't running two
companies, but we were doing some funky things with factory/materials
planning/scheduling that required two environments for our company.  I
started out with two separate, full environments (MM and BB).  In order to
save disk space, we changed to a shared application library, ending up
with an MM and MB environment.  I can tell you that there was no
difference to us in using that, as far as production went.

However, I recently moved back to two completely separate environments.
The only reason I did that was so I would have the opprotunity to have
different applications running at the different levels in the two
environments.  In other words, increased flexibility within the company.
And licensing is not an issue with that, either.

In summary, you get more options with two full environments, and you save
disk with a shared application library.  Note: you still have to upgrade
both environments either way on PCMs or Release upgrades.

Dale Gindlesperger
Fleetwood Folding Trailers, Inc.





"Shrader, Patrick" <pshrader@wkep.com>
Sent by: mapics-l-admin@midrange.com
10/15/01 08:19 AM
Please respond to mapics-l


        To:     Mapics Mailing List <MAPICS-L@midrange.com>
        cc:
        Subject:        Multiple Environment Question


This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Group,

For a couple years two divisions/sister companies have tried operating out
of one MAPICS environment, but as two different accounting companies.
However, mixing the item masters between these completely unrelated groups
has proven problematic over time. Therefore we are planning to create a
duplicate environment and assign one company to each, and work to delete
unneeded information (items, history, etc.) from each over time.

My question: should I share the existing AMALIBx & AMXLIBx libraries with
the new environment, or create a new set of all four MAPICS libraries? I
will be using the MAPICS create program, but I am looking for input on
creating an AB environment from XY, or just an XZ environment.

What are your thoughts and experiences?

Patrick Shrader
White Knight Engineered Products
Thantex Industries


_______________________________________________
This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MAPICS-L@midrange.com
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/mapics-l
or email: MAPICS-L-request@midrange.com
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.





As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.