On Wed, 19 Nov 2008, Buck Calabro wrote:

The reason I was working with 0.17.3 is because the Windows installer
is 0.17.3, and that has the problem. So my mental image of what is
current is skewed by that. I looked in NEWS, README and ChangeLog to
try to see if I missed spotting that 0.17.4 was released to source,
but I didn't see any references.

I guess I'd ask that the Windows download be changed to use 0.17.4,
and maybe a note somewhere as to which version of the source is
current for those of us CVS newbies :-)

Maybe it is time to make a formal release. Not much development has happened in quite a while and we should probably make a release with what we have. I don't have the means to do this fully. Scott, what is your opinion? I can't make Windows binaries (nor do I have the inclination or even Windows). I would be happy to put together a source tarball and a Slackware package. Can someone make an RPM?

I just noticed that the only releases that show on sourceforge are for Windows ( http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=27533 ). When did that happen? No source package? If not, that isn't very good I don't think.

James Rich

if you want to understand why that is, there are many good books on
the design of operating systems. please pass them along to redmond
when you're done reading them :)
- Paul Davis on ardour-dev

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2020 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].