> I'm not sure if we should do this.  The autoconf manual section on
> Particular Function Checks says:
> "If the malloc function is compatible with the GNU C library malloc (i.e.,
> `malloc (0)' returns a valid pointer), define HAVE_MALLOC to 1. Otherwise
> define HAVE_MALLOC to 0, ask for an AC_LIBOBJ replacement for `malloc',
> and define malloc to rpl_malloc so that the native malloc is not used in
> the main project."

Personally, I think we're working too hard to try to solve a problem
that will happen only when zero bytes are requested.  That should never
happen -- if it does, it's a bug in x5250, not in Solaris.

My opinion is that you should remove the autoconf macro.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2022 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.