Re: Problems with LODIMGCLG (was Problems with CRTIMGCLG)

Security officer will let you use the command.  It is above Security
Administrator.  What messages are in the joblog?

On 9/12/06, Butler, Tommy <Tommy.Butler@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:linux400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Butler, Tommy
> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 5:58 PM
> To: 'Linux/400 Discussion'
[snip]
> Turns out I get this:"""
>
> Error with virtual volume image.
> Image catalog ISOCATALOG not loaded to device OPTVRT01.
> """
>
> So it looks like I need to investigate the image no?

As I continue to grow more familiar and proficient with this AS/400 I am
finding out about the integrated help and using it.  One such help message
mentioned to me something about the LOAD IMAGE CATALOG command: """
:       o  You must have security administrator (*SECADM) and all object
:
:          (*ALLOBJ) special authorities to use this command.
:
"""

After more experimentation and poking around I was able to find out how to
view the attributes of my current profile.  I found out that the "class"
of
my caccount isn't *SECADM, but rather *SECOFR (security officer).  It
seems
at face value that this IS the reason for the problem hands down.  HOWEVER
I
am wondering if the *SECOFR is on the same level of clearance as a *SECADM
and that the auth level isn't really the problem.  Does *SECOFR have
sufficient privileges, or is this finally the root problem I've been
trying
to find?

--
Tommy Butler, Linux Engineer
tommy.butler@xxxxxxx
office: (682) 831-8050

_______________________________________________
This is the Linux/400 Discussion (LINUX400) mailing list
To post a message email: LINUX400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/linux400
or email: LINUX400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/linux400.